Posted on

Municipal Fines Exceed Criminal Law Code’s Scale of Fines

Municipality Trafic Fines

First published by Howard Dean in the Business Information Zimbabwe Bulletin, on 19 October, 2021. See footnote …

Municipal Fines quoted in USD, converted at Auction Rate, are much higher than Deposit Fines

Thanks to Sean for raising this one. He asked about the relationship between Council Fines for Traffic Offences in By-laws, imposed by Municipal Police, and Deposit Fines (for Traffic Offences and many other offences) in the Criminal Law Code’s Standard Scale of Fines, imposed by the ZRP. Specifically, he wanted to know if the upper limit of a Level 3 Fine (currently Z$2 000) in the Standard Scale of Fines that the ZRP can impose on-the-spot without the offender first appearing in Magistrates Court also applied to the Marondera Municipal police.

There appears to be an anomaly in the case of the Marondera Municipal Council. Traffic Fines set in USD during the multi-currency period (and not subsequently revised), when converted to Z$ amounts using the RBZ Auction Rate, result in penalties far higher than those prescribed for Levels 1, 2 and 3 (the so-called ‘Spot Fines’, or Deposit Fines) in the Standard Scale of Fines.

Last week a motorist’s minor offence of parking across a white line that demarcated a parking bay resulted in an on-the-spot Marondera Municipal Traffic Fine of Z$5 177.25, more than double the maximum Level 3 on-the-spot Deposit Fine of Z$2 000.

The relevant legislation in regard to that exorbitant fine is found in the Marondera (Clamping & Tow Away) By-laws, 2011, contained in Statutory Instrument 30 of 2011. It is noteworthy that the way the Municipal By-laws are written, an offender does not have a choice to decline to admit guilt, drive away and later argue his case in court. If he does not pay the fine on-the-spot, his car will be wheel-clamped and towed to a municipal pound and there detained until he pays the fine – plus the additional clamping charge and daily storage charges.

The Fines for 33 Traffic Offences in SI 30 of 2011 (referred to as ‘Charges’ in the By-laws) are all expressed in US Dollars. In 2011, of course, we were in a multi-currency situation, predominantly using the United States Dollar, and the Zim dollar had been done away with. However, the municipal fine last week was still apparently quoted in USD – and incorrectly quoted as well.

Today, in our latest ‘new-normal’ dual-currency situation, the 14 levels of Fines
in the Standard Scale of Fines are all stated only in Z$ amounts.

So how did we reach a situation where Marondera Council’s on-the-spot Fines are still quoted in USD and, when converted using the RBZ Auction Rate, result in penalties much higher than on-the-spot police Deposit Fines?

Many Council by-laws have for a long time been something of a mess, without consistency, and without a logical rationale in some cases. Traffic by-laws are a case in point.

For example, the Harare Clamping & Tow-away By-laws, 2005 (contained in Statutory Instrument 104 of 2005) refer under Offences to Fines ‘not exceeding Level 5’. This means that the limit of paying up to a Level 3 Deposit Fine without appearing in magistrates court, as laid down in section 141 of the Criminal Procedure & Evidence Act, comes into operation in regard to traffic violations in the Harare CBD.

However, the Marondera Clamping & Tow-away By-Laws, 2011 adopt a different approach. Section 4, as read with the First Schedule (which consists of a list of 33 offences extracted from the 1972 Marondera Traffic By-Laws), stipulates, “An authorized person (i.e. any person employed or delegated by Marondera Municipal Council) may, if he or she has reason to believe that a violation of the Marondera Municipal Council (Traffic) By-Laws, 1972, specified in the Schedule, has been committed, immobilize or cause such motor vehicle to be immobilized by way of a wheel clamp, provided that no motor vehicle shall be clamped without a traffic ticket having been issued first.”

The list of offences in the First Schedule includes, as item 6, “Park vehicle outside parking place in any road.” A machine-printed receipt was issued to the offending motorist in Marondera last week. It refers to “VIOLATION Code: V 006 Park in undesignated Parking Place” which presumably is intended to refer to item 6 in the First Schedule of SI 30/2011.

Opposite each of the 33 offences in SI 30/2011 appears ‘Charge US$’. These range from US$10 (“Park a pedal cycle within 5 metres of an intersection; and Park any vehicle within 10 metres of an intersection”) up to US$100 (“8-tonne vehicles using residential area roads; and Park vehicle with inflammable or dangerous materials close to building CBD area or residential areas”).

The US$ Charge for Violation 006 is shown in SI 30 of 2011 as US$40, not US$60. SI 30 has not been amended, as far as we can ascertain, so whether the US$60 fine has any legal basis is unknown.

Various issues arise from Marondera Municipality’s approach to Fines/’charges’

Firstly, 8 years after SI 30 was gazetted in 2011, on 24th June 2019 by means of Statutory Instrument 142 of 2019 the use of any foreign currency whatsoever (which included USD obviously, as the dominant currency) was effectively banned in Zimbabwe. The words actually used were “shall no longer be legal tender alongside the Zimbabwe dollar in any transactions in Zimbabwe.” While there were various exceptions to the mandatory use of the Zimdollar, and the list kept growing over the following months, Municipal Council Traffic Fines/Charges were not among the exceptions. So, effectively from June 2019, Marondera Council’s Fines/Charges became the equivalent in Z$’s at the rate of one RTGS Dollar to one US Dollar.
(This was subsequently backdated to February 2019 still at a rate of 1:1, by an amendment to section 22 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019.)

However, on 29th March 2020 the gazetting of SI 85 of 2020 as the 2nd amendment to the principal Exchange Control (Exclusive Use of Zimbabwe Dollar for Domestic Transactions) Regulations (SI 212 of 2019) started us on the road to legitimately quoting prices in dual currencies (‘using the ruling rate’, which became the Auction Rate).

Presumably, Marondera Council then reverted to their US$ Charges for traffic offences, payable either in USD or ZWD at the Auction Rate – which is how I interpret the figure of ‘$5 177.25’ written by hand on the machine receipt issued by the Marondera municipal police officer. Dividing 5 177.25 by 60 gives a figure of Z$86.28 to US$1. (Presumably the Council is not adjusting its software to track the weekly Auction Rate.) If the ‘correct’ charge of US$40 had been invoked, the figure would become Z$129.43 to US$1, closer to the illegal parallel market rate.

Secondly, how did the Council reach the stage where 25 out of 33 of its ‘charges’ for traffic offences in 2011 exceeded the national Levels of Fines at that time?

Delving back into the history of that period, with effect from 1st February 2009 (and unchanged until 1st January 2017) amendments to section 280 and the First Schedule (‘Standard Scale of Fines’) in the Criminal Law Code (Chapter 9:23 of the Statute Law) set fines in USD for the first time as follows –
Level 1 US$5
Level 2 US$10
Level 3 US$20 (and Level 4 US$100 which can only be imposed by a Magistrate after appearance in Court – and which is the top of the range of Marondera Council’s arbitrary Traffic Offence ‘charges’).

So the Council’s ‘charges’ of US$30, US$40 and US$50 for traffic offences bore no relation to the Standard Scale of Fines in the Criminal Law Code at that time. Nonetheless, they were gazetted on 18th March 2011 in SI 30 of 2011 – so the Council appears to have some basis for imposing the ‘charges’.

It will probably have to wait till some irate motorist challenges their legality in Court before it can be determined whether mere Municipal By-laws can circumvent the Criminal Law Code in this way.

Footnotes:

To provide a comparative context, we looked at Fines in other Councils’ Clamping By-laws.
• The USD Fines in Bulawayo’s Clamping By-laws (SI 63 of 2015) were set at US$5, US$10 or US$20 in 2015, which were in line with the Levels, 1, 2 and 3 Fines in the Standard Scale of Fines at that time.
• Zvishavane’s Clamping By-laws (SI 118 of 2013) provide for a Fine not exceeding Level 3; as do Karoi’s Clamping By-laws (SI 94 of 2017); and even Marondera Municipality’s neighbouring Marondera Rural District Council’s Clamping By-laws (SI 202 of 2018) set a limit of a Level 3 Fine. (They also specify 35 traffic offences where the Fines were set at US$10, US$20 or US$30 – although the Standard Scale of Fines Levels 1/2/3 at that time were US$10/15/30).
• Another neighbouring local authority, the Ruwa Local Board in its Clamping By-laws (SI 77 of 2019) similarly set Fines of US$10/20/30 for 15 traffic offences.
• Finally, let’s look at Beitbridge, where traffic snarl-ups and associated offences are currently much in the news. In its 2018 Traffic By-laws (SI 43 of 2018), Beitbridge Council, now a municipality, stipulated a fine not exceeding Level 3 – and also Fines of US$5/10/20 for 17 traffic offences.

Marondera Municipal Council definitely appears to be the ‘odd one out’ in this assembly –and perhaps should re-visit its Clamping and Tow Away By-laws.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

First published by Howard Dean in the Business Information Zimbabwe Bulletin, on 19 October, 2021.

The BIZ service comprises periodic Bulletins like this one, plus quarterly Journals reporting business-relevant High Court and Supreme Court cases. Subscriptions cover costs. If you ARE interested in paying a subscription to receive regular updates (Z$12 000 covers six months) please contact Linda Morgan at aquamor@mweb.co.zw

Posted on

BIG SKY UPDATE: DEPOSIT FINES | PROCESSING ROADSIDE FINES

DEPOSIT FINES

Motorists will be alarmed at media reports of $700 deposit fines, from 1 January. Recent reports of ZRP insisting on payment of fines in US Dollars, haven’t helped stress levels. The following should clarify these issues for Big Sky customers …

DEPOSIT FINES

The short version:

  • The increased fines proposed by Minister Ncube are still going through legal process and are not in effect, yet.
  • The MAXIMUM fine that can be imposed at the roadside remains Level 3, currently set at $30.
  • A fine higher than Level 3 can only be imposed by a magistrate after a court appearance.
  • The deposit fines currently being imposed by ZRP for traffic offences are $10 for Level 1, $20 for Level 2, with Level 3 attracting a fine of $30.
  • Once the final Scale of Fines has been gazetted, Big Sky anticipates Levels 1 to 3 will double to $20, $30 and $60, respectively.

Motorists are reminded you have the right to refuse a roadside fine and appear in court if you prefer not to admit guilt. However, be aware the Harare Magistrate’s Court is dysfunctional and you can expect to be severely inconvenienced …

The long version:

In his 2019 Budget Speech on 22 November, 2018, Finance & Economic Minister Mthuli Ncube proposed a number of measures affecting motorists. Amongst others, the Minister proposed increasing the maximum traffic fine to $700. To implement this and other proposals, the Finance (No. 3) Bill, 2018, was gazetted on 14 December, 2018.

The Bill proposes a revised Standard Scale of Fines, which goes even further than $700, with Level 12 listed as $8,000. (As an example Level 12 applies to “reckless driving” in respect of commuter omnibus and heavy duty drivers). This represents a quadrupling of the Levels from 4 to 14, whereas Levels 1 to 3 are doubled, up to $60.

However, since the minister was questioned in parliament about the severity of these fine levels, we understand they are under review. Big Sky therefore expects fines on all levels will be doubled (not quadrupled), once the final version of the Bill passes through parliament.

In the meanwhile …

  • Motorists are reminded that the MAXIMUM fine that can be imposed at the roadside is Level 3, currently set at $30. A fine higher than Level 3 can only be imposed by a magistrate after a court appearance.
  • The fines currently being imposed by ZRP for traffic offences are $10 for Level 1, $20 for Level 2, with Level 3 attracting a fine of $30.
  • Therefore, do not accept a roadside fine higher than $30, and exercise your right to appear in court if you prefer not to admit guilt.

PROCESSING OF ROADSIDE FINES

Motorists will recall the electronic devices ZRP introduced in June, 2017, at the height of the roadblock-era. These are named the Traffic Enforcement Gadget (TEG) and have since evolved into an efficient means to process deposit fines and accept payment.

  • The Traffic Enforcement Gadget is loaded with traffic statutory information, and the relevant fines. 
  • When imposing a fine on a motorist, the ZRP member will enter the section of the Statutory Instrument or Act, and the relevant fine will appear on the screen, e.g. “C.s. 29 Fail to display current vehicle licence or temporary licence – $10”.
  • The motorist is given three options to pay at the roadside: cash, mobile payment (e.g. EcoCash) or swipe. 
  • When paying with EcoCash, the motorists cell number is inputted into the TEG, which then prints the fine with payment method details, which acts as a receipt. The motorist must receive an SMS notification to his/her cell phone, with ZRP clearly stated as the beneficiary.
  • The TEG has an inbuilt swipe facility and a fine/receipt is printed as above.
  • When paying in foreign currency such as Rands, or Pounds, the device will calculate the amount based on the exchange rate of the day. 
  • When paying by cash, USD and bonds are calculated at 1 to 1 and the motorist has the option to pay in either.

Big Sky acknowledges the contribution from the publishers of BIZ Bulletin, a useful guide to business-relevant legislation. Subscription enquiries to aquamor@mweb.co.zw 

We hope you will find this update useful.

Kind regards … Sean Quinlan

Managing Director

Big Sky Supplies – We prepare you for your journey

Posted on

FINANCE MINISTER PROPOSES $700 TRAFFIC FINES – BIG SKY’S VIEWS

FINANCE MINISTER PROPOSES $700 TRAFFIC

In his 2019 Budget Speech, Finance & Economic Minister Mthuli Ncube proposed a number of measures affecting motorists.

Amongst others, the minister proposed increasing the maximum traffic fine to $700 and imprisonment up to 12 months. (Readers should appreciate the budget is a list of proposals, which will have to be considered by parliament before becoming law).

We can be grateful that government has acknowledged the carnage and state of chaos on the countries roads, and that it cannot be allowed to continue. However, with memories of the trauma inflicted on motorists during the roadblock era still fresh in our minds, we will expect the current government to comply with the laws of the country before implementing any changes.

Paragraph 879 of the 2019 National Budget Statement: “In order to promote road safety culture by adhering to road traffic regulations, the Budget proposes that any person who commits such offenses be liable to fines of levels 8 to 10, which attract a maximum fine of US$700 and imprisonment for a period not exceeding 12 months.”

To legitimatise this measure, government has homework to do, including:

Amend the Road Traffic Act (RTA): Section 81(5) of the RTA says that the maximum fine that the regulations may provide for is level five. An amendment through an Act of Parliament is required, followed by an amendment to the relevant regulations, enacted by the Minister of Transport & Infrastructure.

Amend the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act (CP&EA): Sections 141 and 356 will require amendment to increase the deposit fine level above level three. (These provisions of the Act apply to any offences, not just traffic offences).

Revise the Schedule of Deposit Fines: The Schedule must list the various road traffic offences and the appropriate fines, clearly indicating which fines may be imposed by a member of ZRP versus by a magistrate following a court appearance. We trust the state will differentiate between life threatening offences and the trivial, and set the fines accordingly. To prevent roadside shenanigans, the Schedule must be readily identifiable (dated and on official stationery, etc.).

 The above will legitimise Minister Ncube’s proposals, however we will also request that the payment of fines be efficient and user friendly. For several months now, motorists have been greatly inconvenienced by the non-availability of receipt books and swipe facilities in police stations. These are only available in the least accessible and most inconvenient locations …

In conclusion, motorists should ignore recent misleading lists of fines appearing in the social media. Until government successfully makes the required amendments, the MAXIMUM fine that can be imposed without a court appearance, remains $30. (The current Schedule of Deposit Fines, effective August, 2017, can be downloaded from Facebook group Dear ZRP/Files).

With acknowledgement to the contributors whose advice I rely on, we hope your readers will find this clarification useful.

Kind regards … Sean

MD Big Sky

Pomona Shopping Centre

”WE PREPARE YOU FOR YOUR JOURNEY”